Double Trouble in the Sudan: 2011 as a Catalyst of Change?

Inarguably, 2011 was a continuum-shifting year in Nile Hydropolitics. While the wider Arab Spring contributed to revolution in Egypt in 2011, the division of Sudan in January of the same year to create South Sudan, the world's newest sovereign state, was arguably a greater dichotomic shift in the region. On a national level the coincident alongside the global food crisis in 2008 greatly catalysed a continuum shift in Sudan, transforming the country from oil-orientation more towards agriculture, which naturally requires greater hydrological resources and hydraulic infrastructures (Cascao and Nicol 2016). This is a significant shift as, like Egypt, Sudan has one of the largest natural water deficits, so a shift towards a more hydro-centric industry will only further strain water allocations between riparians (Mielnik 2021).

These factors can foreground an argument that Sudan is the Nile riparian that has experienced the greatest transformation, with the economic and political continuum shifts, together with the 2011 split, completely changing its statehood. Alongside the wider political changes in the heart of Africa upstream on the Nile, it can be argued that the political transformations involving Sudan have greatly altered the view of the Nile, its water allocations and the general condition of statehood in the Basin (Mielnik 2021). The greater emphasis towards domestic hydraulic development has deteriorated its formerly strong political-diplomatic alliances with Egypt, severing the 1959 agreement alliance. On the other hand, relations have concurrently improved with Ethiopia, through agreements on economic integration and bilateral trade. The shift in Sudanese foreign policy coinciding with the shift of hydropower in the Nile Basin should be interpreted as a further impetus of power shifting across the riparian states, with Sudanese hydrological policy leaning towards the hydro-hegemon. 

In a similar vein to Egypt, it has been internal changes in Sudan that have directly corresponded to its hydrological developments and transformations. In one regard, this can indicate that Sudan itself determines and influences hydrological power shifts in the Nile Basin, which can attribute Sudan as the 'kingmaker' in the Nile hydropolitical arena (Cascao and Nicol 2016).

Moving towards 2011, it is important to look at South Sudan's novel independence as important not only in the numeric increase of riparians in the Nile Basin, but also in the manner in which it has transformed the hydropolitical arena, no less in Sudan itself. In one regard, the independence of South Sudan has itself catalysed the transformative [North] Sudanese policy direction, shifting away from its 1959-esque colonial hegemonic agreements.The timelines of South Sudan's independence is significant, in the fact that it coincides with Egypt's hydro-hegemonic downfall during the Arab Spring, as mentioned in the previous blog. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to Hydropolitics of the Nile

Image
  Historically, humans have always been drawn to water. The earliest human habitations can stem their roots back to river civilisations, while some of the current biggest cities in the world have been built around rivers, such as London, Cairo, Shanghai. I n modern times, it has some of the highest concentrations of human populations, with some of the most rapidly growing economies in the world. However, the Nile River Basin has a far longer history, as one of the cradles of civilisation ( Arsano 2007 ). Ancient polities and empires have existed across Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia, while in the modern day, the sheer length of the river in traverses 11 diverse riparian states (Figure 1), with a multitude of cultures and peoples, as well as conflict, instability and impoverishment. From this, an argument can be made that there is no better way to look at how water in a political context has shaped human development than the biggest, and among the oldest inhabited, bodies of water i...
Read more

Herding the Nile Basin with the GERD? Ethiopia's new Hydro-Hegemony in Action

Image
In the last blog post, we discovered how wider political contexts in a country has direct impacts not only on its domestic hydropolitics, but also affects the wider hydrological sphere. Moving on from this, it becomes crucial to look at how Ethiopia has managed to gain and sustain its new political hydropower by 'exploiting its bargaining power' to achieve its own goals, under the guise of mutual benefit across the Nile Basin. (above) A video to highlight the Ethiopia's hydraulic projects being both mutually beneficial for Ethiopia and Sudan, while also perpetuating disputes.   One integral case that we must look at in this context is to look at the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam ( GERD ), the biggest hydrological infrastructural project in the Nile's recent history. It is common to analyse the GERD as a catalyst of change, as its construction is likely to pursue further economic growth for Ethiopia, and wider multilateral trade and economic activity between the ripar...
Read more